“no other metropolitan city in world, not new York nor Los angels have had the opportunity as you have had in Bombay, to do something historic as a key to development”
Sir Bernard Fielden, (British
conservative expert)
Ghost
town. Rust belt. Symbol of industrial decay. These are some of the epithets
Mumbai's downtown Parel had come to acquire since the death of the traditional
textile industry in the 1970s. textile mills in this area have either closed
down or have been declared sick after they piled up huge losses. Mills that
were nothing more than junkyards till a few years ago have suddenly turned into
gold mines, attracting investments and churning out wealth - estimated
at Rs.1,000 crore.
Taking
advantage of a 1991 amendment to the Development Control Rules - which allows a
company to put excess industrial land to commercial or residential use -
promoters of textile mills are rushing to set up showrooms and residential
apartment complexes on their mill land.
Phoenix Mills, a sick unit referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), is bustling with activity today as Mumbai's hip crowd unwinds at the swank CO2 bowling alley the mill now houses.
Phoenix Mills, a sick unit referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), is bustling with activity today as Mumbai's hip crowd unwinds at the swank CO2 bowling alley the mill now houses.
Initiated in the early 19th
century, the cotton textile industry in Mumbai played a significant role in the
city’s economic progress, urban development and social structure today the
central district (the mill precinct) of Mumbai where the mill was once
flourished stands defunct and it is the hot spot of Mumbai real estate market.
Some of the recent development of the mill land is merely commercial of
political exploration. This development do not consider the century long
history of cotton industry and its contribution to the city, mill districts
social requirement and Mumbai’s environmental health. With the rapid
urbanization, population explosion 600acers of mill land is a critical factor
for Mumbai’s urban resurrection. In addition to this economic backbone of the
city the ‘mill precinct’ deserves a due recognition and identity in the ‘image’
of the city Mumbai.
“IT IS NOT A SENTIMENTAL/ HISTORIC APPROACH
BUT A DESIRE TO CREATE NEW FORM AND FUNCTION INSPIRING OLD FABRIC .” -POWELL
[INSPIRED QUOTE]
“WHAT WE NEED IS CONTINUITY , HISTORIC
PRESERVATION IS NOT SENTIMENTALITY BUT A PSYCOLOGICAL NECESSITY WE MUST LEARN
TO CHERISH HISTORY & TO PRESERVE WORTHY OLD BUILDINGS… WE MUST LEARN HOW TO
PRESERVE THEM NOT TO PATHETIC MUSEUM PIECES BUT BY GIVING THEM NEW USES.”
-ADA LOUISE “IN HEALING THE CITY
SCARS”
GIRANGAON – THE MILL PRECINCT
Location
“Girangaon” is a Marathi word for “Mill
village” or the mill precinct, which is characterized by industrial architecture
of more than 50 mills. Over 600 acres of land in this region was dedicated to
textile industry in early19th century. Girangaon was home to thousands of mill
workers and their families. The unique housing settlements by workers, their
social networks and communities dominated Mumbai’s mill precinct for decades.
Diagram to the left highlights Girangaon on the map of Mumbai. The precinct
stretches from Lalbaug to Parel and Worli to Sewri and spreads across an area
of 25sq.km. The entire mill precinct is efficiently integrated into Mumbai’s
mass transit system and well connected to major streets in the city
The inception of textile industry in Mumbai
goes back to late 19th century when the first mill was established by Cowasji
Davar in the year of 1856. By 1862, four mills were added and this number grew
to 21 by 1885. By early 20th century there were more than 50 textile mills in
Mumbai which transformed it from a trading town to a manufacturing center.
Increased employment opportunities in mills drew thousands of migrants from
towns and villages all over the state. By 1931 half of the city’s population
was economically dependent on textile industry.
Development
Residential, institutional and
infrastructure development had already commenced in the south region of the
city and development plans were now being modified and extended towards the
north. To encourage the development of textile industry and promote industrial
production, acres of lands in Central Mumbai were given to the mill owners at
concessional rates by the colonial Bombay Government. Mumbai’s development as
an economic hub was greatly enhanced by these very mills.1 Areas where mills
were located grew to become the heart of the city. Eventually central Mumbai
witnessed a distinctive skyline of tall chimneys and gigantic mill structures.
Characteristics
Over 50 mills in less than a 3
mile radius converted this portion of the city into an incredibly crowded,
lively and dynamic hub. Almost all of the workers employed by mills lived in
close proximity of their place of work. Such an aggregation of worker within a
smaller region of the city increased the social and cultural involvement of the
workers in the community. This led to stronger community ties and a rich
network of physical and social infrastructure.
Social Structure
In the period of 1891 to 1921 the
population of Parel & Byculla doubled where as the population of Worli
& Sewri increased by five times. Mumbai now received migrants from not just
east and coastal Maharashtra, but it was also populated by crowds from Uttar
Pradesh and Gujarat (some of the other states of India) all employed in textile
industry. Mill workers included people from all castes and religion. Soon they
established their distinctive places of worship such as temples and mosques and
started side businesses in meat and vegetable markets. Initially in the migrant
population, the men arrived alone in order to find employment. Later as they
settled they brought their families along. In 1875 when the textile industry
was at its peak the housewives of workers too, started working in the mills for
additional income. However the male population among the workers community
always dominated the female population. Most of the single men lived in groups.
As a result a number of housewives started buffet services and canteens for
lunch and dinner. In 1970’s, the mill precinct had over 500 canteens
predominantly serviced by the female group. Along with these, most of the
residential buildings incorporated side businesses of workers such as retail,26
grocery, newspaper, flower, sweets shops, snack centers, ice-cream parlors,
pharmacy, service shops like laundry shop, domestic flour mills etc. on street
level.
Housing
Due to housing demands from the
mill workers, the Bombay Development District (BDD) and Bombay Improvement
Trust (BIT) built rows of low cost houses in Girangaon. These 1-2 stories high,
single to double room tenements with a common narrow corridor, and a block of
shared toilets situated at the end of the corridor came to be known as “Chawls”.
A group of 3 to 4 Chawls were
built around a central courtyard that became the venue for family celebrations,
weddings, sports, festivals, community fairs and meetings. This congested
tenement living created a “Chawls Culture” based upon a unique, shared
lifestyle and collective identity. Since the dwelling units in Chawls were very
small in area, (Hardly 200sq.ft) most of the residents spent their days in the
common corridors and staircases. Small grounds, sidewalks, spaces between the
two Chawls, benches under trees, boundary edges, shop fronts and street corners
also known as “Chowk” or “Naka” became the social gathering spaces.
Mill lands were designed in such
a way that they will have sufficient amount of open space around them, so that
the nuisance to surrounding community is limited. Hence these lands efficiently
merged into the surrounding urban fabric as opposed to standing exclusive. In
addition to ‘workplace’, mills became a second hometown for mill workers. They
included a place of worship, family clinics and canteens.
Culture
IMAGE 15 CULTURE
|
DECLINE OF THE TEXTILE MILLS
In mid-nineteenth century,
textile industry experienced several technological changes all over the world.
The conventional handloom technology faced a severe competition from the
advanced power loom techniques. The mill owners did not update the machinery in
the Mumbai Mills to keep up with the changing trends and the low skilled
workers were also comfortable with this policy. During the same period the fuel
prices and costs of raw material increased. Reservation policies and adverse
taxation discouraged the mill owners from investing more in the industry. By
1980’s it became uneconomical to maintain large scale industrial units within
the city limits on account of high power and tax costs.1 Also, the economic and technological change struck major
mill towns like Manchester in UK and Lowell in Boston and eventually there was
an overall slump in the world textile market. By 1990’s the employment rates of
service industries increased by large numbers.
TABLE 5
|
REDEVELOPMENT OF TEXTILE MILL LANDS
Redevelopment of mill lands in
Girangaon is one of the few options left for a sustainable revival of the city.
Mumbai’s ecological, social & cultural aspects are the fundamental drivers
in this process of urban revitalization.
When textile mills were fully
operational, they were excluded from reservations for public amenities.
According to an ex-government planner, there was no reason to believe they
would shut down and hence these lands were regarded as industrial zones alone.
But a few years later, with technological changes and economic restrictions
many of the mills were declared ‘sick’ and it was hard for mill owners to pay
thousands of workers unless they were allowed to sell their assets. As a
result, in 1990, DCR 58 (Development Control Regulation) came into existence.
DCR 58 allowed the mill owners to sell part of their land. For the first time
Mill owners were allowed “change of user” from Industrial to Residential /
commercial on the condition that they use the resultant funds for the revival
of the mills. They were allowed to sell only 15 percent of the mill land and
use the resources to modernize the mills.
In 1991, five to six mills were
developed on the basis of DCR 58, but not a single mill undertook any kind of
modernization. The skyline of Girangaon began to change steadily with the
arrival of high rise luxury towers. When Phoenix converted one of its
structures into Bowling alley (the permission for this was obtained on the
pretext of building a recreation center for the workers), Girangaon was really
shaken. The issue of mill lands no longer was limited to mill workers alone: it
concerned the issue of urban development. Please note that the objective of DCR
58 was not supposed to be real estate development, it was meant to protect the
jobs of the workers, by allowing only a partial sale. If the development of
mill lands was the main objective, then the government should have worked on
comprehensive development plan to include all mill lands, in fact the entire
Girangaon. It should have been addressed as an urban planning issue instead.
The
actual outcome as can be seen by all is a
piecemeal, ad hoc and often surreptitious exploitation of real estate for
immediate gains. Under the banner of GKSS (Girni kamgar sangarsh samiti) Mill
Workers Action Committee, a protest march was organized by the workers along
with artists, activists and local residences against government. All of them
spoke against the new real estate developments in which, needs of the neighborhood
were totally neglected
CHARLES CORREA STUDY GROUP REPORT (1996)
Holistic approach
The current piecemeal and
individual development of mill lands is one of the
major problems when it comes to retaining the
character of Girangaon. This approach
initiated by the intransigent mill owners
denies the integrated development the city needs.
It also points out the lack of any overall
planning and development strategy seeking to
create coherent urban form and address other
issues like housing for low income groups,
civic amenities and new employment
opportunities for ex-mill workers.
Girangaon needs a comprehensive urban renewal
plan that will take care of mill
sites as well as the surrounding communities.
Since these lands are in close vicinity to
each other, each could be developed
differently in accordance with its location, size and
neighboring uses and yet is a part of an
integrated master plan for the entire mill district.
A complete system of urban network could be
established by introducing new
destinations for entertainment, public,
retail & commercial activities, transit and
recreational purposes. Consequently the
Government of Maharashtra set up a study group
to prepare an integrated development plan for
textile mills in Girangaon.
The study group chaired by architect &
urban planner Mr. Charles Correa created
a design solution for a comprehensive
redevelopment of textile mills in Girangaon. It
appointed teams of architects, engineers
& conservationists to visit the 58 mills and
appraise & document the various
structures and other prominent features in each of them.
However the group was denied access to 32
mills in private sector. 3 of those mills were
already keen to sell some of their land right
away. Hence the report deals with remaining
36
25 mills that are with NTC and were
accessible. NTC too retained some of its mill units
which they felt were viable and declared to
dispose of the rest. This report principally
addresses the mill land that is to be
disposed of by NTC.
The report identifies a triangular area
between Matulya, Paragon and Mumbai
mills and develops an integrated master plan
for the same. The strategy for land-use
division adopted by the study group supports
the DC rule of 1992. It recommends that the
division between the City, MHADA and the
owner should be fixed at one third each,
regardless of the size of the site. The
report proposes one third (7 mill sites) for public
housing to be developed by MHADA, one third
(4 mill sites & portions of other 4 sites)
for open spaces and public amenities and the
last third (3 mill sties & portions of other 3
sites) for development by NTC. Study group
believes that with this methodology, instead
of a meaningless hodge-podge of development,
large and viable parcels of land can be
made available for each of the 3 land uses
specified, in a pattern which makes overall
urban sense for the city.
Redevelopment plans proposed by the study
group are based on the following factors –
Transport
·
Establish important connector roads.
·
Widen capacity of the existing road and rail
network.
·
Improved pedestrian movement.
·
Exclusive roads for buses to support heavy
traffic of passengers travelling between
buses and trains.
Urban Form
·
Indentify
heritage structures on mill sites.
·
Preserve
and recycle them as studios for artists, workplaces for fashion designers,
·
computer
software engineers etc.
·
Creation of a new center in the heart of the
city, with its own distinctive character,
·
vitality
and ambience.
·
Establish key design guidelines regarding the
urban Form.
·
Development of larger footprints for
economical & energy-efficient construction.
·
Use of building facades to help define
streetscapes.
Open Spaces
·
Open spaces of different sizes to allow
variety of uses.
·
Principal roads widened and lined with trees
to create leafy boulevards.
·
Pedestrian plazas in front of railway
stations.
·
Covered shopping arcades alongside major
roads.
·
Land for public open spaces could be used for
other social facilities like schools,
clinics or community centers
depending upon the needs of the neighborhood.
Employment generation
·
Generation of semi-skilled employment similar
to that provided by existing mills.
·
Development of new high-tech, non-polluting
industries like computers and garment
industry.
·
Large number of household jobs would be
created with the development of high-end
residential zones in place of former mills in
private sector.
Housing
·
Land taken over by MHADA could be used to
develop low income housing, reconstruction of dilapidated buildings or
redevelopment of slums.
38
·
MHADA could hand over some of the
construction to other contractors.
Private Mill development
·
Prepare an Outline Development Proposal (ODP)
for mill sites.
·
Include surrounding area with road network.
·
Identify and document heritage structures
that need to be preserved.
·
Provide land allocation for three types of
uses & an outline of the built form.
Pooling of land
Pooling the land for increased FSI of 2.0 (compared to
FSI of1.33 in island city)
Beneficial in creating large new public spaces.
The cluster of taller buildings generated by the
additional FSI would create a visible
landmark, recognizable across the city’s skyline
as a symbol of the generation of
Parel and with it, the city of Mumbai.
In conclusion, the study group recommends further
research and analysis of the existing
conditions in Girangaon. This report is
limited just to the mill plots themselves,
yet some attention has been paid to the
surrounding areas.
The report also says “to bring about more comprehensive
& decisive urban renewal,
detailed planning would have to be undertaken
to address many problems of the area
such as chawl reconstruction, hosing for the
pavement dwellers, parking for intercity
buses etc. This would also involve resolution
of legal considerations related to repairs
and reconstruction of old buildings.”
TODAY’S TREND OF DEVELOPMENT OF MILL LANDS
City developers and builders have
already redeveloped a number of defunct milllands. The land in most cases is
used for residential high rises and in some cases for
commercial, retail and entertainment sectors.
Almost all the existing structures on these
mill lands were demolished completely (except
a few factory features like Chimney) for
redevelopment. The first textile mill to
redevelop is central Mumbai’s entertainment and shopping hub. A hotel and a
multiplex added later in the development. The new development replaced mill
buildings with very little green open space. Some of the developers did 40 create
some public spaces like shopping complexes, multiplexes and other retail
outlets,
however the benefit of these areas and
buildings for the ecological sustainability of the
city is questionable.
The first to redevelop the
textile mill is today’s Central Mumbai’s
entertainment and shopping hub. A multiplex
and hotel are currently being added here
though the Bombay Municipal Corporation lease
deed in 2005 gives the mill over 20,000
square yards of land at the annual rent of a
rupee for ‘residences of labor staff, and
welfare services like a school’.
The entire plot of
new hind textile mills is dedicated to mass housing for mill workers.Under the
ownership of mhada, this project will have 3500 dwelling for ex-mill workers
while some buildings will serve as transit tenements.currently under
construction, this residential complex has around 20,20 storey buildings that
are all physically linked to each other.
In addition, a
playground and other facilities like bank, community hall and market have been
proposed on the same plot. This ntc mill was modernized and reopened a few
years back. Originally a composite mill, it now only hands spinning. The mill
employs more than 400 workers on permanent and contract basis. The plot area is
comparatively less than other mill sites studied in the study area. Digvijay
mill is one of the NTC mills that are slated for redevelopment through joint
venture. NTC will hold 51% stake in each of thes projects and 49% will be given
to private developers. Proposal for the above mill land is not yet finalised
All mill structures
on this site were completely demolished in 2009. Currently the plot remains
empty. Redevelopment plans for this mill lands are uncertain as this area is
now privatly owned. This mill too, is stated for redevelopment under a joint
venture program. Built structures on the site are currently being demolished.
One of the major NTCmills, Indian United Mill no 4 proposal redevelopment under
a joint venture program. Redevelopment programme started but yet to finalise
it. The plot of Indian united mill no 2 & 3 has been handed over
to city municipality and reserved as a recreational zone. Whereas the area
around this mill land is declared as a heritage precinct.
Along with a recreational ground, a
number of heritage structures on site are proposed to be reused as a museum and
other public amenity.
Study region
·
Textile mill structures are vital part of
Mumbai’s heritage.
·
Hear of Girangon there are 7 mill lands spread
over an area of 580 acres of which 60 acres is total mill land area.
·
The region lies between 2 most important
artery roads in Mumbai.
·
Each mill lands are in close vicinity to each
other and each varies in term of area functionality location and structural
make up.
·
Two of the mill land use has already changed
i.e. the entire plot of new Hindu textile mill is dedicated to mass housing for
mill workers.
Why Indian united mill no. 2 &3?
·
IUML no. 2&3 is the very first mill
structure to be part of Mumbai’s heritage list.
·
The BMC team along with conservation architect
Abha lamba has come up with a number of relevant and interesting ideas for the
development of this land. Development of this site will not only affect its
neighborhood but it will have significant impact on the urban fabric of
Girangon as whole. If developed appropriately , it has the potential to become
an important landmark in the city.
·
Natural water body and dense vegetation on
site demonstrates a high potential for developing a green retreat within the
crowed city. some of the structures on site are still in a fair structural
condition and could be reused for several purposes. Considering the community’s
needs and historic significance, mill buildings on site could be reopened as
public buildings like museum community halls, cafeterias art galleries etc.
·
The size and central location of the site in
the study area increases its importance in the overall strategy of this design
project. Surrounding land uses and urban form could be effectively modified
with the development of this particular site. In addition, detail design of
1uml 2&3 premises will serve more opportunities to create increased
pedestrian flows and street networks along the length of the plot. This will
enhance the exciting and eventful landmarks along the heritage walk within the
precinct.
·
Hence the design component of this project
supports the government’s idea of adaptive re-use of some of the heritage structures
on site and develops a master plan for the entire premises of IUML no. 2&3.
Urban analysis
The
two artery roads –Ambedkar road to the west & G.D. Ambekar Road to the east
of are the main source of vehicular traffic that flows into the internal street
areas. Will defunct mills standing idol for years, this region has less active
streets compared to other streets in the city. Over the years, new residential
and commercial developments have come up which alters the ‘mill characteristic’
of this area. Presently this area
embodies a mix of contemporary and historic architecture. It lacks a
distinctive urban form that might bind the two for a cohesive whole.
The
15 ft high wall around acres of mill site reduces the visual and physical
connection between adjacent blocks. Permeability and mixed land use are two of
the distinctive features of an organic city like Mumbai. For the development of
textile industry, mills were given huge chunks of lands that had ample open
space around the built structures. This was done in order to minimize nuisance
to surrounding neighborhood. However today, the same but inoperative lands
spread over long distances, obstruct the pedestrian flow and reduce the
required pedestrian permeability. Furthermore their singular use makes them
exclusive as opposed to a richer mixed-use development seen everywhere in
Mumbai.
Climate & topography
The
predominant wind direction of Mumbai is North-West. Currently the massive mill
structures on the west side of the site block the NW winds entering IUML
2&3 premises. The site falls into warm & humid climate of costal India.
Hence summer months of April,May & June receive highest solar radiation
where as the monsoon clouds from july through September reduces the heat. The
premises comprises of rich tropical vegetation on a flat terrain.
Land use
Most
of the land use around the site has remained unchanged since the initiation of
the mill in early 19th century. The mixed use residential zones
around the site comprises of traditional worker’s chawls with street side shops
including commercial services.
Two of the seven
mills considered under the study area, are in the vicinity of the premises.
Both these lands are currently unused. With no major landmarks around, the
location of this site could be considered as reclusive.
Street
IUML
2&3 premises are situated alongside one of the main artery roads of the
study area to the East. This road has too active & busy street junctions.
Other streets adjacent to the property vary in levels of pedestrian &
vehicular activities. Street to North & South have moderate pedestrian
activities because of their mixed use residential street fronts.
(Residence+retail+commercial)
The
west street in comparison is virtually a dead zone resulting in an enclosed and
narrow roadside between the boundary walls of two mill sites. Mumbai’s local
bus transport stops are situated at several locations along the East,
North& south streets of the premises. Street to the West however, has no
such stops and hence lacks a significant amount of pedestrian flow
Have some work plz contact 9768435945
ReplyDeleteany Email id for contact?
ReplyDeleteI'm also dealing with the same project and I'm not allowed for a site visit so can you pls help me with site photographs.
ReplyDeleteWhich of the cotton textile mills you are looking at?
DeleteHello, I'm currently in my 5th year of B.arch and working on my thesis on adaptive reuse of these cotton textile mills, it would be helpful if you let me know how did u get access to the mills and how did you approach the project ahead.
ReplyDeletecurrently looking at India United mills no 2 and 3, 1, 6, and Digvijay mills.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHello, It would be helpful if you were able to share plans and sections of India united mills no. 2 and 3, even clear drawings will help
ReplyDeleteHey, I am also looking to document India united Mills 2 & 3 for my college. Did you get the floorplans by any chance?
Deletehi is there any chance you can help out
ReplyDeleteyes, you can mail me at akanksha1607kamble@gmail.com
Deletethankyou so much
Deletehi saw your reply a few days ago have have sent you an email from sakshi.doshi06@gmail.com